The Women's Tennis Association (WTA) recently released an advertising campaign declaring that "Strong is Beautiful," which sounds like a progressive movement at first-- after all, it's a campaign devoted to recognizing that the women who compete in tennis at a professional level (as well as women in athletics in general-- strong women) are beautiful in a way that is rooted in their trained strength. But somehow, instead of encouraging women to get active and competitive regardless of, for example, how they look, these ads are further problematizing the role of female athletes.
"Strong is Beautiful" is a great sentiment, but the fact of the matter is that as long as the term "beautiful" is being used in advertising for women's athletics, no real progress is being made. Instead of focusing on the athletic abilities of these women, it's focusing on their physicality, as though this advertisement is making it okay for a woman to be multifaceted, like before this ad revolutionized women's athletics, strong and beautiful existed in binary opposition and it was impossible for a woman to be both.
 |
Model Athlete? Or Model, Athlete? (Tyra Banks would be so proud of that smize) |
Then there's the ad itself: Petra Kvlotva is swinging a tennis racquet, but in a pose that looks more like a ballerina than a professional tennis player. Her hair is curled to perfection, down and flowing, her face is perhaps more pallid and serene than the Virgin Mary, and that dress. Petra Kvlotva is pictured-- strength and beauty personified-- in a flowing red high-low number that belongs in an episode of America's Next Top Model over an advertisement that teaches girls and women that they can be pretty and athletic. The background of the ad fades from purple to orange, bathing Kvlotva in a flattering sunsetty glow. She is the very picture of beauty, looking more like a Greek Goddess awkwardly holding a tennis racquet than an athlete awkwardly forced to take a swing in an outfit that's even impractical by tennis standards.
 |
| Add caption |
In stark juxtaposition to this photo, the ATP World Tour advertisement shows three tennis greats, all men, swinging their racquets, muscles tensed, faces barred into expressions of concentration and intensity. The caption on their photo isn't an encouraging sentiment about how being strong can also be pretty, it's two words, pure and simple, all caps: BEAT THIS. The advertisement exudes athleticism--
look at their muscles, look at their workout clothes, look at the action lines superimposed over the picture so the viewer can see exactly where their swing came from, the full range of motion. They don't have to justify themselves in sport by being pretty, because they're not supposed to.
Men in sports are intense, focused, determined. Women are all of those things, too, it's just covered up by lip gloss and curled hair, plastered to sunsetty backgrounds of ads that oversexualize athleticism. The contrast between these two blatantly gendered advertisements not only propagates gendered stereotypes within the sporting realm, but also in general. Women are culturally expected to be delicate, fragile, graceful and beautiful, whereas hegemonic masculinity mandates that men be strong and rugged and determined. If these ads don't epitomize gender in sports, I don't know what does.